Tendulkar to play alongside Lara in Cricket All-Stars

The two greatest batsmen of their generation will now get a chance to bat together as captain Sachin Tendulkar drew Brian Lara’s name along with 13 other players as part of the “Sachin’s Blasters” squad for the Cricket All-Stars series beginning at Citi Field on Saturday.In a random draw conducted Thursday in Times Square, Tendulkar drew Lara as well as former Indian teammates VVS Laxman, Sourav Ganguly and Virender Sehwag. Tendulkar also no longer has to spar with Glenn McGrath, having picked the Australian pacer for his side in a bowling group that also includes Curtly Ambrose, Shaun Pollock and Muttiah Muralitharan.While the luck of the draw meant that Tendulkar wound up with his Indian batting brethren, Shane Warne wound up drawing a slew of his former Australian teammates to play for “Warne’s Warriors” including Matthew Hayden, Ricky Ponting and Andrew Symonds. Warne also wound up with a dream fast bowling trio of Courtney Walsh, Allan Donald and Wasim Akram.While the first 26 players were drawn by lots, Shoaib Akhtar’s status was decided by a coin flip. Warne called heads, but the coin came up tails, drawing a big sigh of relief from Tendulkar. The first All-Stars match begins on November 7 at Citi Field in New York with two more in Houston and Los Angeles on November 11 and 14.Sachin’s Blasters: Sachin Tendulkar (c), VVS Laxman, Sourav Ganguly, Virender Sehwag, Brian Lara, Mahela Jayawardene, Carl Hooper, Lance Klusener, Shaun Pollock, Moin Khan, Graeme Swann, Glenn McGrath, Muttiah Muralitharan, Shoaib Akhtar, Curtly AmbroseWarne’s Warriors: Shane Warne (c), Matthew Hayden, Ricky Ponting, Michael Vaughan, Jacques Kallis, Kumar Sangakkara, Andrew Symonds, Jonty Rhodes, Saqlain Mushtaq, Wasim Akram, Daniel Vettori, Courtney Walsh, Allan Donald, Ajit Agarkar

Haldipur, Gavaskar put Bengal in driver's seat

A second wicket partnership of 123 runs off 175 balls between NikhilHaldipur (92) and Rohan Gavaskar (53) placed Bengal in the driver’sseat in their Ranji Trophy Super League match against Delhi atCalcutta on Thursday. Bengal finished the day at 194 for four wicketswhen play was called off 19.2 overs before the scheduled close of playdue to bad light.Earlier, the Bengal bowlers had restricted Delhi to 236 in the firstknock with opener Akash Chopra being the top scorer with 95. It was amarathon knock that saw occupy the crease for 437 minutes. He faced328 balls and hit 12 boundaries. He was the last batsman to bedismissed off Utpal Chatterjee, caught at slip by SauravGanguly. Laxmi Ratan Shukla took the wickets of Rahul Sanghvi andSanjay Gill to finish with four wickets while Sumit Panda started theslide dismissing Nikhil Chopra in the third over of the morning.Bengal were rocked early as Gill had Devang Gandhi caught behind for aduck. Then Haldipur and the junior Gavaskar took over. Both playedfreely in front of the wicket and never allowed the bowlers todominate. Haldipur was severe on Robin Singh (jr) whom he hit forthree fours in an over. Just when he looked set for his sixth RanjiTrophy hundred he holed out to mid on of the bowling of RahulSanghvi. It was a rash shot. His 92 was compiled off 118 balls with 16boundaries. Gavaskar completed his 50 gliding Chopra to the fine legfence. But he perished in the next over bowled by Sanghvi. He tried toloft him over mid off and was caught by Chopra.In walked Ganguly. The 8000-odd crowd which had gathered to watch himhowever, were disappointed as he fell for five. He was not fullyforward to a ball from Chopra and the resultant pad-bat was snapped upat silly point by substitute Gautam Gambhir for only five. At stumpsSrikant Kalyani (23) and Syed Saba Karim (11) were taking Bengaltowards their first target of five points for the first innings lead.

Hip! Hip! Hinds!

For six uplifting hours at Kensington Oval yesterday, Wavell Hinds transformed the West Indian pessimism of the recent past into real hope for the future, immediate and long-term.The tall, slim, 23-year-old left-hander’s commanding 165, his first hundred in his fourth Test, was the backbone of a total of 283 for five that carried the West Indies to a lead of 30 when fading light brought an end to the second day of the second Test 3.2 overs before the scheduled, extended close.Ever eager to take on Pakistan’s varied, high-class bowling on a batsman-friendly pitch, Hinds used his bat with such effect that his chanceless innings was embellished with 24 resounding boundaries in almost every direction.He disdained the modern practice of applying the pad as first, not second, line of defence and was only troubled by the late left-arm inswing of Wasim Akram, one of the game’s most successful bowlers in his 94th Test.Whenever he had the chance, he thumped the ball with genuine power.Just as significant, his performance was an irrefutable indication that worry over the present state of West Indian batting, especially at a time when the future of the mercurial Brian Lara remains in considerable doubt, has been somewhat exaggerated.The optimism was boosted over the final hour and 50 minutes by the mature debut Test innings of Ramnaresh Sarwan, at 19, slim and diminutive and seeming to be a boy on a man’s mission.His approach belied the appearance. Like Hinds, it was positive and his right-handed technique was solid and attractive.He despatched Abdur Razzaq and Wasim Akram for two disdainful boundaries through midwicket and aided Hinds in a fifth-wicket partnership of 69 at a time when the West Indies have been so often been inclined to go into terminal collapse.He resumes this morning on 28 with a heavy obligation since the current advantage of 30 is negligible for a team that must bat last.Curtly Ambrose is by his side, having fulfilled his nightwatchman role, with Ridley Jacobs and the other three fast bowlers to follow.The West Indies’ situation would have been considerably more comfortable had Hinds not failed by ten minutes to last out the day.He fell to a tired hook shot off Waqar Younis with the second new ball that lobbed from the splice of the bat to mid-on.It was a stroke the Pakistanis had fed him throughout with varying results. Some were airily miscued but short of fielders, others were thumped to the boundary, none with more authority or relish than three in one over from Wasim Akram.Hinds began his critical innings quarter-hour into play when left-handed opener Adrian Griffith’s fine leg-glance off Waqar Younis was taken down the leg-side by the tumbling wicket-keeper Moin Khan.Enjoying the benefits of an accommodating surface from which even the tried and proven Pakistanis could make little impression, Hinds outlasted his three senior partners: Sherwin Campbell, who made 58 and with whom he added 133 for the second wicket, and fellow left-handers Shivnarine Chanderpaul and captain Jimmy Adams, both dismissed cheaply.He immediately advertised his approach with two confident off-side boundaries in the same over from Waqar and, by lunch, already had nine fours in 51, three off Mushtaq Ahmed whose leg-breaks and googlies had so confused him in the rain-ruined first Test in Georgetown.In his 40th Test, Campbell carries a heavy burden of responsibility but he has had an indifferent season. Kensington is his home, and favourite, ground where he has gathered two of his four Test hundreds and, once settled after a difficult opening salvo from Wasim Akram, he indulged himself in his preferred backfoot strokes and looked better and better on the hard, true, grassless pitch.He hooked Waqar and Akram for sixes and, when Mushtaq’s leg-break justbefore lunch dropped short enough, he sent that over the square-leg boundary.A fourth six came from the unusual device of a straightforward leg-glance to long-leg. Akram’s return cleared Moin’s head, a clutch of slumbering fielders failed to back up and, as Waqar set off towards long-off in pursuit of the wayward ball, Campbell and Hinds converted the original single into six.As the partnership developed, frustration clearly set in for the Pakistanis.Twice, Hinds mistimed strokes that just eluded fielders, while four times Moin and Akram argued over the state of the ball with umpires Rudi Koertzen and Eddie Nicholls before they finally had their way and it was replaced.They regained their composure during the lunch interval and batting was not nearly as easy on resumption.Once more, Akram posed difficult questions with his late swing that confused Hinds and brought three lbw appeals in the same over, one of which, off a full toss, was as close as they get. Hinds was then 62.At the opposite end, Campbell’s dismissal after a steady innings was unlucky. He played Saqlain into his pad and could not prevent the ball rolling back to dislodge the off-bail.When Abdur discomfited Chanderpaul with a wicked bouncer that brushed the glove on the way through to Moin just before tea and Adams was given out 35 minutes into the final session to a slip catch off a prodigious off-break from Saqlain that television replays clearly showed missed the bat, the West Indies were still 40 behind.It was a difficult time for two young batsmen. But Hinds and Sarwan saw it through like veterans.

Worcestershire recover after dreadful start

Vikram Solanki’s century (113) and debutant James Pipe’s half century(54) helped Worcestershire to move to 231 for 5 in 64 overs afterbeing 8 for 3 against Warwickshire at New Road today.James Pipe, reserve wicketkeeper to Steve Rhodes, was included as aspecialist bat due to impressive performances in the second XI. He wasquick to gain attention with a wide range of shots in his 64 ballinnings. But it was Solanki, who took the centre stage with his secondcentury of the season off 140 balls after being dropped on 81.Worcestershire after winning the toss made a disastrous start, losingPhilip Weston and Graeme Hick for ducks and Paul Pollard for five bythe eighth over of the innings. Then Solanki and David Leatherdalestemmed the rot with a fourth wicket partnership of 67 runs in 23overs.

Bulls prolong Victoria's horror run

Prolonging both its miserable early season run of form and an horrific record in Brisbane, Victoria has slumped to a crushing ten wicket loss at the hands of Queensland today in the teams’ Pura Cup clash at the Allan Border Field. The win, which came on the final afternoon, catapults the Bulls into a clear lead on the Pura Cup table and leaves the Bushrangers firmly entrenched at the very opposite end of the standings.Openers Matthew Hayden (118*) and Jimmy Maher (103*) and paceman Joe Dawes (6/98) were the heroes of the Bulls’ win. With a first-class career best, it was the redoubtable Dawes who played a major role in limiting the Victorians to a second innings score of 326 through the first part of the final day. Around another fine early-season innings from the rejuvenated Brad Hodge (101*) and a hard-hitting century from Ian Harvey (100), the hulking right armer joined with Adam Dale (3/87) to trigger a crucial late collapse from the Victorians for the second time in three days. Of particular significance was the eleven over burst shortly before lunch that produced the loss of the wickets of Darren Berry (13), Paul Reiffel (7), Colin Miller (5) and Michael Lewis (1).As for Hayden and Maher, they could barely have made the Bulls’ progression to their victory target of 229 from a possible fifty-nine overs appear any more comfortable. Hayden was at his domineering best, all but sealing a spot in the Test team to play West Indies in a fortnight with his second major contribution for the match. Continuing his rich vein of form, the busy Maher was also in command, albeit against an attack which seemed overawed by the placid nature of the pitch.”We are such a strong side,” said a beaming Hayden after the match. “To win two games on this kind of wicket, a southern type of wicket is great and I just can’t wait to get back to the ‘Gabba … where we have a huge home ground advantage.””We’re always trying to get out of our comfort zone and create chances that will make us champions.”Champions they are a long way from becoming yet, but the Bulls’ start to the season is certainly reminiscent of the record-breaking run that started them on their way to the first-class title last summer. From their opening three games, they have already plundered fourteen points and their depth of resources will serve them well again when each of the states is affected by the loss of its international representatives shortly.For Victoria, on the other hand, a season which promised so much is rapidly starting to become unglued. No side in recent memory has been as badly hit by injury but, save for Hodge, it is hard to identify too many players in their line-up at present who are playing at close to optimum potential.

Northern Titans off-season training squad

The Nashua Titans coach, Dave Nosworthy, is energised after a well deserved break and is planning an early start to the forthcoming season selecting the following off-season training squad to commence practice on Monday, 28th May 2001 at 14h00 at SuperSport Park.Players currently in South AfricaGerald Dros, Finley Brooker, Allahudien Palaker, Steve Elworthy, Rudi Steyn, Victor Faul, Nigel Brouwers, Aldin Smith, Tetaan Henning, Johann Botha, Pieter van Rooyen, Gary Hampson, Craig Parker, Nick van Woerkom, Dale Nation, M.P. Ferreira, Charl Victor, Raymond Magardie, Maurice Arenstam, Mulligan George, Shafiek Abrahams, Rudi Bryson, Ian Kuiler, Neil McKenzie & Robert van Wyk.Players OverseasDavid Townsend, Martin van Jaarsveld, Pierre Joubert, Jacques Rudolph, Greg Smith, Quentin Still & Dirkie de Vos.Players attending the National AcademyJohann Myburgh, Kruger van Wyk & Dewald Senekal.Players attending the Northerns AcademyRuper Bailey, Friddel de Wet & Alviro Peterson.IMPORTANT – PLEASE NOTE
The final Nashua Titans Squad, ‘B’ XI Squad and Colts Squad will be selected and finalised before the end of August 2001. The above squads can at any time be adjusted and altered as they are very flexible squads.

Review of Pakistan v England 2001 test series

Pakistan won the second Test match of the two-test series at Old Trafford by a convincing margin of 108 runs and levelled the series 1-1. Earlier, England won the Lord’s Test by an innings and 9 runs inside three days. The victory at Old Trafford kept Pakistan’s record intact of not having lost a series in England since 1982. In fact, they had won all the test series played between 1982 till the 2001 rubber. England’s resurgence in international cricket, after a poor run for past several years, is being hailed. Their consistent creditable performance, as shown in the last five series, can be attributed to a methodical display of discipline and professionalism. Indeed, the English team is performing well with renewed vigour and determination and expected to do well in the forthcoming Ashes series.Here is a brief review of current 2-test series:Lord’s Test
Pakistan packed their squad with all three quick bowlers. The demon fast bowler, Shoaib Akhtar, who bowled the quickest delivery of recent times at 97.7 mph against Australia in the NatWest Series match, was also included despite fitness problems. Waqar Younis won the toss and put England into bat. The decision did not succeed as English batsmen prevailed over the Pakistan bowling to score 391. Graham Thorpe scored 80 and Nasser Hussain contributed 64. He was injured by a sharp rising delivery from Shoaib Akhtar. With Saeed Anwar and Inzamam-ul-Haq failing to deliver, Pakistan followed on after being dismissed for 203. Only Younis Khan played a resolute knock of 58. Darren Gough claimed 5 for 61 and Andrew Caddick 4 for 52, with 15 wickets falling on the third day. Pakistan performed worse in the second innings, being dismissed cheaply for 181. Abdur Razzaq (55) was the lone resistance against a lethal England attack of Gough, Caddick, and Cork. The Man-of-the-Match Andrew Caddick claimed 4 for 54 whereas Gough and Cork took 3 for 40 and 3 for 41, respectively.Old Trafford Test
England looked well set for another victory chasing a target of 370 when they were 85 for none at the close of play on the fourth day. They moved on to 201 for 2 by tea on the final day. It was only after tea that the match turned around completely. First Waqar Younis, Wasim Akram and Abdur Razzaq bowled hostile spells and then Saqlain Mushtaq completely exploited the situation, as 8 wickets tumbled with the addition of only 60 runs. In the end England lost fairly and squarely by 108 runs. Earlier, Pakistan won the toss and posted an imposing 403, mainly built around a magnificent 114 by Inzamam-ul-Haq. Rashid Latif and Younis Khan also came good with 71 and 65. Gough, Caddick and Hoggard claimed three wickets each. In reply, England was going great guns when Graham Thorpe and Michael Vaughan combined for the third wicket partnership producing a record 267 runs. A smart throw on his follow through by veteran Wasim Akram ended Thrope’s innings at 138, with Vaughan (120) also following soon. Pakistan came back strongly and forced England to concede a 46-run crucial first innings lead. Pakistan started disastrously in the second innings. Saeed Anwar was the notable failure. Inzamam, Younis and Youhana joined hands to first restore and then consolidate an innings, which looked in trouble at 63 for 3. The innings took a more formidable shape when Rashid Latif (21) and Wasim Akram (36) scored quick runs to give visitors a total of 323. Once again Gough, Caddick and Hoggard shared three wickets each. Inzamam was declared the Man-of-the-Match and also the Player-of-the-Series for Pakistan. Graham Thorpe was the Player-of-the-Series for the home side.

Kaneria puts Sri Lanka in a spin

The unofficial Test series between Sri Lanka and Pakistan was delicatelypoised tonight after a frantic second day of the final four-day game atGalle today. Fortunes fluctuated throughout the day and both sides stillharbour realistic hopes of victory, even if Pakistan hold the upper handafter a five wicket haul by Danish Kaneria.Bizarrely, on such a fine batting pitch, twenty-six wickets have now fallenin the first two days and, barring bad weather, a conclusion withinthree-days now appears a certainty. Sri Lanka now have a lead of 108 withjust four second-innings wickets remaining.Sri Lanka’s bowlers, led by Thilan Samaraweera, fought their side back intomatch in the morning as they took six wickets for 47 runs. Hasan Razaresponded by compiling a 52-run partnership for the last wicket andcompleted his second hundred of the series in the process. The crucialpartnership, quite possibly a match winning one, left Pakistan with avaluable 38 run lead.Avishka Gunawardene then shrugged off the early dismissal of ShanthaKalavitigoda in the Sri Lankan second innings with another powerful displayof batting. He wiped out the deficit in a flash, as he as he carved thefaster bowlers, particularly Najaf Shah, who was disdainfully pummeled for14 in his second over, around the ground in a 56-ball half century.Raza was quick to introduce Danish Kaneria, Pakistan’s promising legspinner, and though the brawny left-hander played more studiously, the legspinner eventually had him caught at cover in near identical fashion to hisfirst innings dismissal. It ended a 73 run partnership for the second wicketthat was swinging the match towards Sri Lanka.Kaneria then ran through the brittle middle order. Chamara Silva (4) wastrapped leg-before wicket in Kaneria’s next over, Michael Vandort (35) wassnapped up at short leg, Malintha Warnapura (1) was caught behind as hetried to sweep, and Jevantha Kulatunga (7) top edged a sweep as he tried tobreak the shackles. Sri Lanka had lost five wickets for 27 runs and slippedfrom 94 for one to 121 for six.An undefeated seventh wicket partnership of 25 between Thilan Samaraweeraand Prasanna Jayawardene halted the slide and gives Sri Lanka hope tomorrow.When Pakistan arrived this morning they were confident of compiling aseries-winning first innings lead on a fine batting pitch, but came unstuckafter the introduction of Samaraweera. The off spinner, a revelation in thethis series with 20 wickets so far, swept through the middle order afterRuchira Perera had trapped Misbah ul-Haq leg-before wicket in the third overof the day.Yasir Arafat, Humayun Farhat, and Irfan Fazil were all snapped up by thebat-pad catchers; all defeated in the air as they groped forward to smotherthe spin. Pakistan went into lunch on 122 for seven.Straight after the interval Dinusha Fernando picked up the wickets of KashifRaza and Danish Kaneria with Pakistan still 14 runs adrift of Sri Lanka’sfirst innings score.Sri Lanka’s recent cricket history, however, is littered with frustratinglast wicket partnerships that have allowed their opponents to grab back theinitiative. Hasan Raza, who was on 55 when the ninth wicket fell, exposedthat weakness again, as he upped the tempo.Given solid support by Najaf Shah, who scored just five of the 52 runpartnership, Raza induced a sense of panic with a series of bold, sometimesinnovative, strokes. Immediately after reaching his four-hour hundred,however, scored off 197 balls, Najaf Shah was trapped leg-before wicket toend the innings.

My theory on the reason for England's One-Day woes

The crusade marches on with our third championship win of the season,convincingly beating Warwickshire by 150 runs.Warwickshire were in secondplace with a game in hand so it was vital we left Birmingham with maximumpoints.Warwickshire was the county that Roger Twose played for and had successwinning several trophies, particularly in the One-Day leagues. It was alsowhere Roger introduced himself to Brian Lara, their overseas pro at thetime, by hanging a sign on Brian’s locker welcoming the second best left-handerto the county. The best left hander was obviously himself.I had personal success this game aggregating 159 runs for the match. Nocentury, being caught on the boundary from a top edge sweep shot for 92.Disappointing, but nice to be back in the runs after a lean couple of weeks.Unfortunately, the team’s form in the four-dayers hasn’t been matched in the One-Day competition. On Wednesday we lost our third game on the bounce and may nowstruggle to get promotion come the end of the year.My one day league woes continued, so far I’ve only flirted with doublefigures averaging 10 from my three games. Yesterday I had more problems,dislocating my little finger when fielding on the boundary. It’s prettyunnerving when you see one of your digits pointing 90 degrees the wrong way!X-rays this morning show no break which is of great relief as there aresome important matches coming up, including the One-Day series in Sri Lanka.A lot of ice and a bit of luck should see me fit for Friday which is ournext championship match.With England’s poor performance in the recent triangular tournament, therehas been a lot of comment made in the papers over the last few daysconcerned with the future of One-Day cricket in this country.I have a theory on the English One-Day game, and it is not having a crack attheir players – I’ll leave that to the tabloids, but more a moan about thequality of pitches that are served up for Sunday league (45 overs) cricket.In the championship, pitches must be of the highest quality otherwisecounties are fined and points are deducted. There is a panel of turfexperts that travel the country inspecting each wicket before it’s played on.This is a good system allowing positive conditions and stopping teamsdoctoring wickets to suit their side.They have nothing like this in place for One-Day wickets, in fact, it worksthe other way and teams can get away with murder. So far this year wehaven’t played a 45-over match on a fresh pitch.All the wickets have beenused for previous games so, in most cases, you are playing on wickets that areinto their fifth day.Now you think in a test match, batting last on a worn wicket is never easy,try scoring five an over on it!What happens on pitches like these is thatmediocre bowlers who don’t usually bowl, all of a sudden become worldbeaters. The slower you bowl, and the more accurate you are, the better.These bowlers that are having success week in week out now get looked at forhigher honors, but everyone knows that once on a good wicket againstinternational batters, it will be a different story.The other problem forthe selectors is finding batters who are consistent in these conditions.There aren’t many, so the One-Day side seems to be selected fromperformances in the championship.If you play on a better standard of wicket you will get a clear idea of whatplayers can do. It gives players confidence and is a far better spectacle.

Cricket through the ages

Even in pre-historic times the game of cricket was played in some form or the other. It’s said to originate with one player throwing a ball-like object at a stool or similar item, while another player, standing in front of it, tried to fend the ball off from hitting the target with his hand. Other players stood around waiting for their turns either to defend or attack the stool.At a later stage, players were divided into two groups or sides. While one side tried to defend the wicket, the other stood around to assist the bowler to recover the ball when struck away. In this way, fielding began and with it the practice of counting runs, when the striker hit the ball and ran to and from an appointed mark. The individual or side that scored greater number of runs was the winner, as it is today.A later development was the introduction of a piece of wood, the crooked form of a bat, instead of the hand to hit the ball with. So the essentials of the modern game, i.e. bat, ball and a wicket were all present. It became an accepted rule that if the ball hit the stool or wicket the striker was out, as he was if caught by a fieldsman before the ball touched the ground.The next change was the replacement of the stool by a single stick or stump placed behind a round hole. The hole played an important part because the batsman was obliged to put his bat into it each time he took a run. Similarly if the ball was placed into the hole when the batsman was out of his ground, he was declared ‘out’. The concept of hitting or uprooting the stump to claim a ‘run-out’ did not exist then.The further development was to enlarge the size of the target by pitching two stumps with a cross piece of wood placed on top but the hole in front of them was retained. The next move was to do away with the hole replacing it with a line in front of the wicket, the origin of the popping crease of today. Three sticks were then substituted for two and two cross pieces known as bails were placed on top of them, the whole apparatus forming the wicket.After some time the size of the wickets was standardised and remained unchanged until World War I. Then, in order to assist the bowlers who were finding it difficult to dismiss the batsmen, it was enlarged further. The principle of pitching the three stumps sufficiently close to prevent the ball going through was, however, maintained.It may be interesting to know that in the late 70s we discovered a Gandhara Art statue picture from Lord Buddha’s era in the archives of the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) then BCCP. The statue depicts some boys hitting a ball with a crooked wooden stick. It indicates that the type of game discussed above, was also played in the region forming present-day Asia, long before it came to be known as ‘cricket’.Though such a pastime existed in many countries of the world before the year 1200, it is almost certain that the modern game originated in England. Cricket matches between the public schools, however, began towards the close of the 18th century. There was a good deal of wagering in these matches, which were usually played for money involving pretty high stakes.Worse than the gambling was a kind of the cheating that accompanied it. Men sat near the pavilion to give and take bets. It was normal for them to circulate a false rumour about a player, in order to influence betting. Umpires were intimidated and there is a case on record, when an umpire was dragged by the losing team to the village pond and summarily ducked.Taken up by the gentlemen of wealthy families, cricket became very popular in the 18th century. A blow from a cricket ball killed Frederick, the Prince of Wales and a devotee of the game, in 1751 but this incident did not affect the game’s popularity. Matches were played between two sides of eleven players each, although in the earlier days it was not uncommon for a strong XI agreeing to play against a team comprising of a larger number of weaker players.Similarly, there were four balls to an over but the number was increased in 1889 to five and in 1900 to six. This meant a considerable saving in time because after each over the fieldsmen were required to change their places to receive bowling from the other end. At one time the Australians even had eight balls an over, which were later reduced to six. The white coat that the umpires wear to distinguish them from the players was introduced in 1861.Cricket is perhaps the only game, which requires a player to learn so many skills, batting, bowling, fielding and wicket keeping. In the old days, the bowling was underhand. In 1794 round-arm bowling was tried in a match at Dartford but was disallowed. Sometime in the 19th century it was permitted but later changed to the over-arm style of today. Bowling can be fast, medium pace or slow. A fast bowler relies upon pace but the accuracy of line and length are highly desirable. It was the combination of these three, which made Tom Richardson, the Surrey professional, the greatest fast bowler of his times. In modern cricket, Jeff Thomson of Australia enjoyed a similar distinction.A history making controversy between authorities in England and Australia erupted when England’s fast bowler Harold Larwood, developed a theory known as ‘bodyline bowling’ and put it into action during England’s tour of Australia in 1932. Pitching his deliveries at the leg stump he devastated the Aussies by making the batsmen give away easy catches to a leg trap formed by close-in fielders. Considered as ‘negative bowling’ it was not repeated again.A googly ball attracted a great deal of attention when it was first introduced in about the year 1900. BJI Basanquet of England and the South African RO Schrwas are regarded as the inventors and perfectionists of this perplexing art of slow bowling.There were a host of great cricketers during the past centuries but their deeds were eclipsed soon after 1850, when the gigantic figure of Dr WG Grace appeared on the scene. Grace was the man who did more than any other player to make cricket a popular spectacle as well as a healthy pastime. This is proved by a well known incident, when early in an innings, Grace being probably out by an excellent stumping, was declared ‘not out’. After a loud appeal from the wicket-keeper, the umpire retorted, “These people have come to see Dr Grace bat and not to watch your monkey tricks.”A superb batsman, Dr Grace was a useful bowler and an excellent fielder too. Although no one has matched Sir Don Bradman in terms of his batting and there have been a galaxy of great cricketers since, but Dr WG Grace is regarded as the undisputed father of the game.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus